![]() National Center for Appropriate Technology 3040 Continental Drive Butte, MT 59702 406.494.8662 Fax 406.494.2905 |
Pennsylvania's REACH Program Evaluation SummaryAbstract Grant Amount Goals
Another objective was to reduce or at least maintain energy usage at pretreatment levels while improving indoor comfort. Client Eligibility Criteria Client Services Thirty-five homes had small temperature data loggers installed that recorded hourly temperatures at mid-height in upper floor bedrooms, at bedroom ceilings and often on the first floor. Outcomes Building simulation modeling indicated that roof insulation alone could provide the same cooling benefit as the white roof coating at a substantially lower cost. However, the coating should significantly extend the life of the roof, protecting the house and roof insulation. ECA found that 40 percent of their clients have roofing problems and the local Home Weatherization Assistance Program has approved white roof coating as a treatment for homes that need roof repairs. If widely adopted, the white roof coating could have an impact on the overall urban heat island effect that makes urban neighborhoods experience considerably hotter temperatures than areas with more shading. There is a high level of interest in replicating the Cool Home approach in other housing and weatherization programs in Philadelphia and throughout the nation. Pre-treatment and post-treatment monthly gas usage data from Philadelphia Gas Works was used to determine the overall gas impacts of the Cool Home and weatherization treatments. An average savings of about 89 therms/year, equal to about 6 percent of pre-treatment gas usage, was found in the sample of homes. There was no comparison group for the analysis so results should be considered approximate. Post-treatment electric usage data was not available to assess potential electric savings. Contact the LIHEAP Clearinghouse for the full-text evaluation report. Page Last Updated: June 14, 2007 |
